Syrian missile shield
A recent development in these nuclear disarmament talks showed that Obama was ready to scrap plans to build the missile shield in Eastern Europe if Russia aided them in stopping Iran's nuclear program.
Now I'm no fan of the current Russian President Dimitry Medvedev and certainly not a fan of President Barack Obama but I like to think that Prime Minister Vladamir Putin is really pulling the strings on Medvedev like most people think, which is why after Obama's statement Russia should put forward plans to build their own missile system in Syria.
This scenario was discussed before but steps have yet to be taken, but it is absolutely necessary and I have a feeling that less than 57% of Syrians would oppose it (the same amount of Poles who opposed a missiles being placed in their country).
Why I say it's necessary:
If the US think it's necessary to place 10 interceptor missiles in Poland and a long range radar system in the Czech Republic to counter the Iranians from developing nuclear power plants then I think Syria is more obliged to cover every inch of it's air space because of the small state of Israel in which it has no diplomatic ties with and the one that carried out an air strike on it's territory two years ago, one that is not just developing nuclear weapons, but sitting on a stockpile of at least 60 nuclear weapons, and have in their inventory missiles that can hit any place in Syria!
Yes I think Russia would be well doing it's part as a world power by giving Syria and Iran a credible air defence, preferable the S-300 portable SAM sites which can shoot down enemy fighter-jets and ballistic missiles in the very possible likelihood of an Israeli strike.
And (predictably) Israel will play it's bullshit card saying it's feeling threatened by the presence of these defensive missiles in Syria and will threaten to attack them, Russia should counteract this threat by diverting several of their nuclear bombers to patrol Syrian skies and put Tel Aviv under the nuclear hammer (for a change) and let them see how it feels to be on the receiving end of such diabolical threats!
Now I'm no fan of the current Russian President Dimitry Medvedev and certainly not a fan of President Barack Obama but I like to think that Prime Minister Vladamir Putin is really pulling the strings on Medvedev like most people think, which is why after Obama's statement Russia should put forward plans to build their own missile system in Syria.
This scenario was discussed before but steps have yet to be taken, but it is absolutely necessary and I have a feeling that less than 57% of Syrians would oppose it (the same amount of Poles who opposed a missiles being placed in their country).
Why I say it's necessary:
If the US think it's necessary to place 10 interceptor missiles in Poland and a long range radar system in the Czech Republic to counter the Iranians from developing nuclear power plants then I think Syria is more obliged to cover every inch of it's air space because of the small state of Israel in which it has no diplomatic ties with and the one that carried out an air strike on it's territory two years ago, one that is not just developing nuclear weapons, but sitting on a stockpile of at least 60 nuclear weapons, and have in their inventory missiles that can hit any place in Syria!
Yes I think Russia would be well doing it's part as a world power by giving Syria and Iran a credible air defence, preferable the S-300 portable SAM sites which can shoot down enemy fighter-jets and ballistic missiles in the very possible likelihood of an Israeli strike.
And (predictably) Israel will play it's bullshit card saying it's feeling threatened by the presence of these defensive missiles in Syria and will threaten to attack them, Russia should counteract this threat by diverting several of their nuclear bombers to patrol Syrian skies and put Tel Aviv under the nuclear hammer (for a change) and let them see how it feels to be on the receiving end of such diabolical threats!
Labels: european missile shield, israel, russia, syria
posted by Paul Iddon @ 8:52 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home